When love looks like control: Are Christian parents modelling healthy boundaries?

There’s something I need to admit before I say anything.

I am that parent.

I have my child on Find My iPhone. In honesty, I probably check it way more than I should. Not in a dramatic, hovering way, but routinely, almost without thinking. I’ve normalised this behaviour so much that when his phone dies or he loses signal, I can physically feel it. A subtle shift at first, then a rise. A tightening in my chest. A low-level hum of anxiety that doesn’t quite make sense but is undeniable.

Are we modelling boundaries that feel less like trust and more like access? If so, what might that be teaching them about love?

Yet, when I was a child, I rode my bike for hours with no tracking, no check-ins, no digital tether. The only instruction from my parents was simple: return home when the streetlights come on.

That was it. Safeguarding at its finest.

Somewhere between then and now, something has changed. To be clear, I’m not rejecting the need for better safeguarding, or the kind of parenting that is present and engaged; however, it does lead me to wonder if we are creating a version of care that’s discreetly shaping unhealthy expectations, both for us and for our children? Are we modelling boundaries that feel less like trust and more like access? If so, what might that be teaching them about love?

Care has started to blur into expectation

“Text me when you get there.”


“Share your location so I know you’re safe.”


“Why didn’t you reply? I could see you online.”

If your child is venturing out alone, there’s a good chance those messages resonate. None of this comes from a bad place. It comes from love. From wanting to protect, stay connected, and feel reassured that your child is secure in a world that often doesn’t feel safe. Yet, somewhere, somehow, something subtle has shifted.

for most young people, control doesn’t look like ‘control’. It arrives as ‘care’, but not necessarily one that leads to freedom

Care has started to blur into expectation. Connection can feel more like access.

And what we model as love can be interpreted as if you care, you’ll always be available.

We don’t question it because it looks like closeness and feels like good parenting. But should we ask ourselves, what are our children learning about love from this?

When access becomes affection

For many teenagers, relationships now exist almost entirely through their phones. Messaging isn’t occasional. It’s constant. Presence isn’t assumed; it’s demonstrated.

Gone are the days of the Nokia 3310, where ‘Snake’ was the height of digital connection. Now, location sharing is normal. Read receipts carry meaning. A delayed reply isn’t just a pause; it starts to become the question: Why weren’t you there?

Perhaps unintentionally, we’ve raised a generation who believe love must be continually demonstrated

In this world, love starts to look like immediacy. Availability. Reassurance on demand. A continual stream of proof that you are thinking about the other person.

It’s subtle and rarely feels aggressive. In fact, it can often feel intense, affirming, and validating.

“If you loved me, you’d tell me where you are.”


“If you cared, you’d reply properly.”


“I just want to know you’re safe.”

None of these statements sound controlling on the surface. That’s precisely the issue. Because for most young people, control doesn’t look like ‘control’. It arrives as ‘care’, but not necessarily one that leads to freedom (Galatians 5:1).

love becomes something you have to constantly prove

Perhaps unintentionally, we’ve raised a generation who believe love must be continually demonstrated. It’s shown by replying quickly, sharing openly, giving access, and always being emotionally available.

Subtly, love becomes something you have to constantly prove. A task that is impossible to sustain. Because there is always another message. Another reassurance required. Another moment to explain.

For teenagers, whose identities are still forming, this creates a kind of relational pressure they are not yet equipped to carry. If I don’t show up in the right way, at the right time, I might lose this relationship.

That isn’t just emotional intensity. It becomes the cost of love, rather than the freedom love is meant to bring.

When closeness starts to limit freedom

The challenge is that none of this looks like harm in the way we might expect.

There is no shouting, no obvious aggression, no clear line being crossed. Instead, it looks like constant checking in, a need for updates, or an expectation of availability. Over time, this begins to shape behaviour.

Over time, this begins to shape behaviour

Your child may feel anxious about putting their phone down. They might avoid doing things that cannot be easily explained or shared. They may even start to prioritise someone else’s emotional needs over their own or feel responsible for keeping someone else calm.

Not because they’ve been forced. But because they have learned that this is what love requires. Even if it costs them their freedom.

Before we rush to correct our children, we should pause. This is the uncomfortable ‘ouch moment’. Much of what we observe as parents did not start with them.

In isolation, saying we worry when they don’t reply isn’t wrong. It’s honesty, rooted in care. But when repeated often enough, it starts to form a pattern

We have normalised constant contact. We have sought immediate responses. We have shown them what it looks like to be constantly available.

In isolation, saying we worry when they don’t reply isn’t wrong. It’s honesty, rooted in care. But when repeated often enough, it starts to form a pattern. One where access is expected, not offered.

So, when a boyfriend or girlfriend asks for the same thing, it does not feel unfamiliar. It feels normal.

That’s the tension.

Love without pressure

The Christian story offers a very different picture of love. One rooted in freedom rather than control. As Scripture reminds us, ‘It is for freedom that Christ has set us free’ (Galatians 5:1).

While God’s love is constant, it’s not invasive.
It’s present but doesn’t demand proof.
It invites, rather than coerces.

As Scripture puts it, “perfect love drives out fear” (1 John 4:18). Not because it removes difficulty, but because it removes the need to perform in order to remain secure.

If love feels like pressure, they will learn to perform it. But if love feels secure, they can begin to live it

That kind of love does not need constant updates or immediate replies. It creates space. It allows a person to be fully known without being monitored. It loves without overstepping. It connects without taking freedom.

For young people, that distinction matters. If love feels like pressure, they will learn to perform it. But if love feels secure, they can begin to live it.

Rest assured, this is not about banning phones or policing friendships. It’s about awareness, not control. It’s helping our children develop language for what they are experiencing and being mindful of what we are modelling in the process. It’s reframing our fears, our triggers, our questions.

The shift is not in caring less, but in how we express that care.

Read more:

Violence is not love - why Christian parents need to be ready to talk about BDSM

Help your children navigate a sexually confusing world with gospel confidence

5 ways Christian parents can respond to ‘situationships’

And if your child is navigating relationships, it’s gently asking:

• Do you feel free in this relationship?

• Can you switch off your phone without worrying?

• Do you feel responsible for how the other person feels?

These are not interrogation tools. They’re invitations for dialogue.

These conversations matter, because control can be hard to recognise. Not because teenagers are naïve, but because it doesn’t look how they expect. Like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, it looks like attention. Like care. Like someone wanting them.

We’re invited to model a kind of love that reflects the love we have first received from God

That’s what makes it powerful.

As parents, we will not get this perfectly right. Trust me, I certainly won’t. I’ll probably still check that little blue dot more than I should.

Thankfully, we are not called to perfection but invited into awareness.

We’re invited to model a kind of love that reflects the love we have first received from God. A love that says: you do not need to prove yourself to stay connected to me.

This becomes the template they carry into their relationships. And in a culture where love is increasingly measured by visibility, access, and response time, that kind of modelling is radical.